Making Good Software

A blog by Alberto G (Alberto Gutierrez)

Written by Alberto G

June 14th, 2009 at 11:13 am

Debugging: 7 steps to fix an error

with 3 comments

Why debugging is important?

Debugging is the group of activities that software developers perform to fix a bug, so being a good debugger is a very important part of being a good developer.

3 reasons to consider debugging one of your main skills:

  1. We spend a lot of time debugging. By improving your debugging skills you are likely to change this balance so that you can spend more time coding new features.
  2. There are always errors in your code and you will have to debug them without introducing new errors. There are two famous quotes that illustrate this.
  3. Debugging is sometimes the only way to check that some code is working fine.

3 consequences of being a bad debugger

  1. Low productivity. Debugging is one of the main activities when developing software, bad debuggers will have to spend more time debugging and that will affect their productivity.
  2. Not being able to fix the real bug. One of the challenges when fixing an error is to identify it, errors are like icebergs: their visible part is just 10% of the problem, which is the only part that bad debuggers are going to look into, leaving the other 90% alone ready to cause some titanic catastrophe.
  3. Leaving collateral damage. Modifying code to fix an error has the risk of generating a completely new one, bad debuggers are likely to forget about this and will create some collateral damage every time they try to fix a bug.

For all the previous reasons, debugging has to be treated as an essential part in the software development, and the following steps will help you to be a better debugger.

7 Steps to fix a bug

The correct approach to debug is to follow a very structured procedure based on repeating the same steps for every bug, the reason for this is that bugs usually are symptoms of a much bigger problem going on, so in order for us to uncover the real nature of the error we have to make sure we do an exhaust and systematic revision of it.

The degree of formality when following the steps may vary depending on the bug, for critical errors is better to document every single step in a document, for minor errors, or bugs found while coding is just enough to follow them as a mental guideline to make sure we cover all the error.

Step 1. Identify the error.

This is an obvious step but a tricky one, sometimes a bad identification of an error can cause lots of wasted developing time, is usual that production errors reported by users are hard to be interpreted and sometimes the information we are getting from them is misleading.

A few tips to make sure you identify correctly the bug are.

  1. See the error. This is easy if you spot the error, but not if it comes from a user, in that case see if you can get the user to send you a few screen captures or even use remote connection to see the error by yourself.
  2. Reproduce the error. You never should say that an error has been fixed if you were not able to reproduce it.
  3. Understand what the expected behavior should be. In complex applications could be hard to tell what should be the expected behavior of an error, but that knowledge is basic to be able to fix the problem, so we will have to talk with the product owner, check documentation… to find this information
  4. Validate the identification. Confirm with the responsible of the application that the error is actually an error and that the expected behavior is correct. The validation can also lead to situations where is not necessary or not worth it to fix the error.

Step 2. Find the error.

Once we have an error correctly identified, is time to go through the code to find the exact spot where the error is located, at this stage we areĀ  not interested in understanding the big picture for the error, we are just focused on finding it. A few techniques that may help to find an error are:

  • Logging. It can be to the console, file… It should help you to trace the error in the code.
  • Debugging. Debugging in the most technical sense of the word, meaning turning on whatever the debugger you are using and stepping through the code.
  • Removing code. I discovered this method a year ago when we were trying to fix a very challenging bug. We had an application which a few seconds after performing an action was causing the system to crash but only on some computers and not always but only from time to time, when debugging, everything seemed to work as expected, and when the machine was crashing it happened with many different patterns, we were completely lost, and then it occurred to us the removing code approach. It worked more or less like this: We took out half of the code from the action causing the machine to crash, and we executed it hundreds of times, and the application crashed, we did the same with the other half of the code and the application didn’t crash, so we knew the error was on the first half, we kept splitting the code until we found that the error was on a third party function we were using, so we just decided to rewrite it by ourselves.

Step 3. Analyze the error.

This is a critical step, use a bottom-up approach from the place the error was found and analyze the code so you can see the big picture of the error, analyzing a bug has two main goals: to check that around that error there aren’t any other errors to be found (the iceberg metaphor), and to make sure what are the risks of entering any collateral damage in the fix.

Step 4. Prove your analysis

This is a straight forward step, after analyzing the original bug you may have come with a few more errors that may appear on the application, this step it’s all about writing automated tests for these areas (is better to use a test framework as any from the xUnit family).

Once you have your tests, you can run them and you should see all them failing, that proves that your analysis is right.

Step 5. Cover lateral damage.

At this stage you are almost ready to start coding the fix, but you have to cover your ass before you change the code, so you create or gather (if already created) all the unit tests for the code which is around where you will do the changes so that you will be sure after completing the modification that you won’t have break anything else. If you run this unit tests, they all should pass.

Step 6. Fix the error.

That’s it, finally you can fix the error!

Step 7. Validate the solution.

Run all the test scripts and check that they all pass.

Plus a few recommendations…

Document the bug and the fix.

Document each step, the code changes, and the new unit tests, add also the unit tests if possible to your build and to your regression test routine.

Technical considerations.

These three technical considerations are actually part of Joel’s article, The Joel Test: 12 Steps to Better Code

  1. Use the best tools money can pay to debug.
  2. Use a source control tool.
  3. Use a bug tracking system.

Preventing and helping to find future bugs.

Log is the developer’s best friend when it comes to find errors in a production environment, make sure there is always a log in your application, that is readable, and that it is helpful to track down what the application is doing.

3 Responses to 'Debugging: 7 steps to fix an error'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Debugging: 7 steps to fix an error'.

  1. Someone will say: “Debugging sucks, testing rocks”. Reproducing an error means produce a unit test that fails because of this error, which will take care of regression: this is the important part of the 7 steps. Once the test is in place, it is only a time matter before the bug will be fixed.

    Giorgio Sironi

    21 Jul 09 at 5:13 am

  2. Agree on this post.

    As a Java developer, I spend most of my time in debugging. I usually try to reproduce the bug in a small scale, as debugging my enterprise applications would take much longer time. Once the bug is identified in the small application, I’ll then fix it in the enterprise application.

    Veera

    21 Jul 09 at 7:19 am

  3. I found its good to have debugging rocess.
    There are factors which causes for delay in debugging. The time lag which is between detection and correction is very crucial. How this time lag can be decreased ? or what are factors which count for time lag for debugging a bug is a area of concern.

    Can we identify some area which need to be addressed more..

    Dr.V.B.Singh

    27 Jul 11 at 4:13 am

Leave a Reply