<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Types of code. How to rate your code from A to F.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/2009/06/30/types-of-code-how-to-rate-your-code-from-a-to-f/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/2009/06/30/types-of-code-how-to-rate-your-code-from-a-to-f/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:36:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alberto Gutierrez</title>
		<link>http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/2009/06/30/types-of-code-how-to-rate-your-code-from-a-to-f/comment-page-1/#comment-7662</link>
		<dc:creator>Alberto Gutierrez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 00:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/?p=508#comment-7662</guid>
		<description>Hi Ronie!

Yeah, I think you have a point there, because our ego it&#039;s hard to evaluate our own code objectively... As you say probably we should always let others judge the code for us.

Thanks for your comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ronie!</p>
<p>Yeah, I think you have a point there, because our ego it&#8217;s hard to evaluate our own code objectively&#8230; As you say probably we should always let others judge the code for us.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronie Uliana</title>
		<link>http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/2009/06/30/types-of-code-how-to-rate-your-code-from-a-to-f/comment-page-1/#comment-7651</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronie Uliana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/?p=508#comment-7651</guid>
		<description>Nice idea! Especially because 3 categories of classification are not that difficult to judge.

The basic problem is to judge your own code. It always seems more simple and extensible than it really are. It seem simple because you already know it. It seems extensible because you cannot imagine a &quot;realistic&quot; worst enough scenario.

However, if you leave the judgement to others, it&#039;s a nice concept :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice idea! Especially because 3 categories of classification are not that difficult to judge.</p>
<p>The basic problem is to judge your own code. It always seems more simple and extensible than it really are. It seem simple because you already know it. It seems extensible because you cannot imagine a &#8220;realistic&#8221; worst enough scenario.</p>
<p>However, if you leave the judgement to others, it&#8217;s a nice concept <img src='http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chorriander</title>
		<link>http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/2009/06/30/types-of-code-how-to-rate-your-code-from-a-to-f/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>chorriander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 08:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/?p=508#comment-159</guid>
		<description>Nice article, it makes much easier to know if your code is good or bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article, it makes much easier to know if your code is good or bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
