<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Types of programmer, or “why can’t we be friends?”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/2010/01/27/types-of-programmer-or-%e2%80%9cwhy-can%e2%80%99t-we-be-friends%e2%80%9d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/2010/01/27/types-of-programmer-or-%e2%80%9cwhy-can%e2%80%99t-we-be-friends%e2%80%9d/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:36:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anhar</title>
		<link>http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/2010/01/27/types-of-programmer-or-%e2%80%9cwhy-can%e2%80%99t-we-be-friends%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-6843</link>
		<dc:creator>Anhar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 14:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/?p=1203#comment-6843</guid>
		<description>Very interesting article indeed, I think I&#039;ve certainly seen those types!

From the above matrix types I have filled each one of those types in different projects.

You mentioned that you never met the best type (one that could switch between types). Well you have now! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting article indeed, I think I&#8217;ve certainly seen those types!</p>
<p>From the above matrix types I have filled each one of those types in different projects.</p>
<p>You mentioned that you never met the best type (one that could switch between types). Well you have now! <img src='http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorber Sebastien</title>
		<link>http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/2010/01/27/types-of-programmer-or-%e2%80%9cwhy-can%e2%80%99t-we-be-friends%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-4831</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorber Sebastien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/?p=1203#comment-4831</guid>
		<description>I hate pragmatic action heroes in complex applications :)

But sometimes i can be one, if i&#039;m alone on a small project...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate pragmatic action heroes in complex applications <img src='http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But sometimes i can be one, if i&#8217;m alone on a small project&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yogsototh</title>
		<link>http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/2010/01/27/types-of-programmer-or-%e2%80%9cwhy-can%e2%80%99t-we-be-friends%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-4631</link>
		<dc:creator>yogsototh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 07:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/?p=1203#comment-4631</guid>
		<description>I believe I naviguate through the fourth type of programmer.

In fact I choose the best method for the project or act I have to do. If it is a one shot program, I tend to be a pragmatic/no planner.

If it is a program I do for myself, I tend to be a (tiny planner)/sophisticated

If it is a big long project I tend to be a Über planner/sophisticated.

If I have to repair a project I didn&#039;t coded I tend to be a pragmatic/no planner.

I am almost never planner/pragmatic, because, If I plan, I try to make the best I can. And the best I can is always sophisticated.

In some way, stay in only one quarter should be a proof of inadaptability. Which in programming area can be a problem. In two or three year may be Agile will be better considered than UML/planner. And opposite is true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe I naviguate through the fourth type of programmer.</p>
<p>In fact I choose the best method for the project or act I have to do. If it is a one shot program, I tend to be a pragmatic/no planner.</p>
<p>If it is a program I do for myself, I tend to be a (tiny planner)/sophisticated</p>
<p>If it is a big long project I tend to be a Über planner/sophisticated.</p>
<p>If I have to repair a project I didn&#8217;t coded I tend to be a pragmatic/no planner.</p>
<p>I am almost never planner/pragmatic, because, If I plan, I try to make the best I can. And the best I can is always sophisticated.</p>
<p>In some way, stay in only one quarter should be a proof of inadaptability. Which in programming area can be a problem. In two or three year may be Agile will be better considered than UML/planner. And opposite is true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarybug</title>
		<link>http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/2010/01/27/types-of-programmer-or-%e2%80%9cwhy-can%e2%80%99t-we-be-friends%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-4503</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarybug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/?p=1203#comment-4503</guid>
		<description>I dunno, by nature I&#039;ve always been in the &#039;Action Hero&#039; camp of just starting and then iterating, with only small plans for various major features, but recently I&#039;ve started planning ahead and it&#039;s made my life a lot easier.

Granted I wouldn&#039;t know what to plan *for* if I hadn&#039;t flown by the seat of my pants so often, and I&#039;ve also found my plans don&#039;t account for everything and have to be changed on the fly sometimes, but I think I might start trying to be a new kind of programmer just to see how it works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno, by nature I&#8217;ve always been in the &#8216;Action Hero&#8217; camp of just starting and then iterating, with only small plans for various major features, but recently I&#8217;ve started planning ahead and it&#8217;s made my life a lot easier.</p>
<p>Granted I wouldn&#8217;t know what to plan *for* if I hadn&#8217;t flown by the seat of my pants so often, and I&#8217;ve also found my plans don&#8217;t account for everything and have to be changed on the fly sometimes, but I think I might start trying to be a new kind of programmer just to see how it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Types of programmer, or “why can’t we be friends?” &#124; Making Good Software -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/2010/01/27/types-of-programmer-or-%e2%80%9cwhy-can%e2%80%99t-we-be-friends%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-4488</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Types of programmer, or “why can’t we be friends?” &#124; Making Good Software -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/?p=1203#comment-4488</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Fred Beringer, Daryl Walleck, Camille Roux, Nathan Jamin, OlivierBeauvais and others. OlivierBeauvais said: Types of programmer http://bit.ly/awvU3V [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Fred Beringer, Daryl Walleck, Camille Roux, Nathan Jamin, OlivierBeauvais and others. OlivierBeauvais said: Types of programmer <a href="http://bit.ly/awvU3V" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/awvU3V</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
