Comments on: Robustness, the forgotten code quality. http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/2010/03/02/robustness-the-forgotten-code-quality/ Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:08:56 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3 hourly 1 By: Anonymous http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/2010/03/02/robustness-the-forgotten-code-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-6893 Anonymous Mon, 26 Apr 2010 01:11:05 +0000 http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/?p=1235#comment-6893 [...] uma arquitetura mais adquada para sites sem usar EJB e aumentando as capacidades de teste e robustez das aplicações. Algumas pessoas pediram um exemplo mais concreto desta arquitura. Porque isto [...] [...] uma arquitetura mais adquada para sites sem usar EJB e aumentando as capacidades de teste e robustez das aplicações. Algumas pessoas pediram um exemplo mais concreto desta arquitura. Porque isto [...]

]]> By: Terry A. Davis http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/2010/03/02/robustness-the-forgotten-code-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-5382 Terry A. Davis Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:11:07 +0000 http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/?p=1235#comment-5382 I added a preprocessor directive called #assert to my compiler. In school they had such a thing for asm. #assert is an excellent way to make robust code. It prints a warning if something is not true. My source code has active links, like html. I put links to other locations which must be updated if something is changed. Out-of-date comments and documentation are a nightmare--you should try to solve that for robust code. I added a preprocessor directive called #assert to my compiler. In school they had such a thing for asm.

#assert is an excellent way to make robust code. It prints a warning if something is not true.

My source code has active links, like html. I put links to other locations which must be updated if something is changed.

Out-of-date comments and documentation are a nightmare–you should try to solve that for robust code.

]]>