<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: QDD (QA Driven Development). How QA should be&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/2010/06/07/qdd-qa-driven-development-how-qa-should-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/2010/06/07/qdd-qa-driven-development-how-qa-should-be/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:13:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: O melhor da semana 04/07 a 10/07 &#171; QualidadeBR</title>
		<link>http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/2010/06/07/qdd-qa-driven-development-how-qa-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-9594</link>
		<dc:creator>O melhor da semana 04/07 a 10/07 &#171; QualidadeBR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 02:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/?p=1359#comment-9594</guid>
		<description>[...] QDD (QA Driven Development). How QA should be… &#8211; Alberto Gutierrez (Making Good Software); [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] QDD (QA Driven Development). How QA should be… &#8211; Alberto Gutierrez (Making Good Software); [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Babu VL</title>
		<link>http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/2010/06/07/qdd-qa-driven-development-how-qa-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-8986</link>
		<dc:creator>Babu VL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 05:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/?p=1359#comment-8986</guid>
		<description>Hello ,

Good well thought points. I would like to add a few:
1. QA approach should be unbiased.
2. QA should have witnessed previous field deployments to understand the Quality delivery importance.
3. QA should closely monitor post deployment to scale the products usefulness.
4. QA should develop caliber to estimate the Product Fitness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello ,</p>
<p>Good well thought points. I would like to add a few:<br />
1. QA approach should be unbiased.<br />
2. QA should have witnessed previous field deployments to understand the Quality delivery importance.<br />
3. QA should closely monitor post deployment to scale the products usefulness.<br />
4. QA should develop caliber to estimate the Product Fitness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention QDD (QA Driven Development). How QA should be… &#124; Making Good Software -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/2010/06/07/qdd-qa-driven-development-how-qa-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-8365</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention QDD (QA Driven Development). How QA should be… &#124; Making Good Software -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/?p=1359#comment-8365</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jeremy Romey【ツ】, Sara BROCA. Sara BROCA said: QDD (QA Driven Development). How QA should be… http://j.mp/aBLNou #qa [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jeremy Romey【ツ】, Sara BROCA. Sara BROCA said: QDD (QA Driven Development). How QA should be… <a href="http://j.mp/aBLNou" rel="nofollow">http://j.mp/aBLNou</a> #qa [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

